Your Ticket Inside the Movies

 


Review: Looper

16
Posted October 2, 2012 by in Action

Rating

Plot
90%


Acting
85%


Directing
85%


Cinematography
80%


Costume
85%


Musical Score
75%


Total Score
83%

83/ 100

What We Thought

Genre: , ,
 
Director:
 
Actors: , ,
 
MPAA:
 
Runtime: 118 Minutes
 
Available in 3D: No
 

What We Liked :

Smart, Original Science-Fiction, Cast is uni-formally excellent
 

What We Disliked:

Some ideas needed to be developed more, Second half comes as a bit of a surprise
 
Bottom Line

If your looking for smart, well-done science-fiction, look no further than Looper.

by Max
Full Article

Have you ever had a battle with yourself? If you could travel through time to change events, would the consequences be worth it? Director Rian Johnson’s new film, Looper, asks those questions while simultaneously providing a terrific Science-Fiction film.

Looper takes place in the year 2044. While there are communities and people that still exist in this time, the people with all power are known as “Loopers”. In the year 2074, time travel will become a reality, but the technology is forbidden. The only people with access to these time travel devices seem to be big crime syndicates. Due to other safety regulations in 2074, it has become increasingly difficult to knock someone off. The mob has set up a system where they send the hostage back in time where the loopers execute and burn the bodies, erasing their existence.

One of these loopers is Joe (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), a young man understanding of his situation and preparing for his future. He is aware that once his time is up, the mobsters will send the 2074 version of himself back to be executed thus “closing the loop”. All loopers are then given enough gold to live out the rest of their thirty year life span, although they know exactly how and when they will die.

If a looper has second thoughts about killing his future self, both versions are marked for deletion. Seth (Paul Dano) fails to kill his future self and the consequences are dire. After a chummy conversation with gangster Abe (Jeff Daniels), Joe gives up the location of his best friend . One of my personal favorite concepts of the entire movie happens here and sets up a unique communication system between current and future self. That’s only a little of what Looper has to offer.

Of course, Old Joe (Bruce Willis) and Y0ung Joe eventually cross paths in 2044. Old Joe doesn’t go down without a fight and escapes his execution. Thus both Joe’s are marked to be terminated and have their own agendas. Young Joe needs to kill Old Joe so that he can live out the next thirty years of his life; Old Joe has returned to stop the man (in 2044 still a child) responsible for killing someone he loves dearly in the future. Since neither party wants to concede to the other, Old Joe escapes and Young Joe needs to find shelter from those who want him dead.

Are you still with me? Most of the storyline is easy enough to follow, it’s only when trying to follow the timelines does the logic get a little messy. Looper has a lot more twists and turns in store and never takes the easy path towards telling its story.  The second half of the movie was never including in the promotional materials for Looper. What begins as a non-stop chase movie, slows down to contemplate morals and contemplate weighty decisions.

The execution of the second half of the picture falls a little flat. A lot of the science-fiction that meant so much earlier in the film takes a back seat. While it works for what Looper wanted to accomplish, it didn’t have as much intrigue. There is also an issue with the introduction of the evolution of humans known as telekinesis. It seems as though it was thrown in as a plot device to make sense of the finale, but it seems like a tacked on addition to the story rather than a fully fleshed out idea.

Pierce Gagnon would be right next to Quvenzhané Wallis

The cast is uni-formally good, easily proving that Joseph Gordon-Levitt is leading man material. Bruce Willis has his most complex performance in a long time and has shades of his performance in Twelve Monkeys which was fantastic. Emily Blunt and newcomer Pierce Gagnon also deserve mention in their sequences in the barn yard sequences of the film. If there was a ranking for incredible child performances Pierce Gagnon would be right next to Quvenzhané Wallis.

Even with the complicated timelines and contemplative second half, Looper is one of this year’s best science-fiction offerings. There is a lot of originality here and the ideas that Rian Johnson uses from fellow Sci-Fi contemporaries work wonderfully within the framework Looper has created. If your looking for smart, well-done science-fiction, look no further than Looper.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, we’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments below. It would be great if ‘liked’ our Facebook Page or follow us on Twitter to get more goodness. There’s lots more where this came from!

 


About the Author

Max

Chief Editor of Impassionedcinema. A film enthusiast who studies and creates his own films. Criticizing movies is his favorite pass-time.

16 Comments


  1.  

    I haven’t seen Quvenzhané Wallis, but Pierce Gagnon was awesome. And cute!

    I watched The Omen the other night and while that child is considred a “classic” as far as I understand it, I thought Gagnon was superior in his screen presence.




  2.  

    a great review Max. I agree with you and glad you mention Levitt’s ability to carry a film, because he really did do so.

    I liked this film a lot. Perhaps just a tad bit more, but we agree on this film! Well written sir!




    •  
      impsndcnma

      I think you liked it more than me for sure. I\’m not even sure it\’d make my top 10 of the year thus far, but we\’ll see in the next few months.




  3.  

    Nicely said sir. I saw this last night, even though Teri had a review of it last week I agree with her score (4 stars)

    It was nice to see it staying away from a lot of time travelling cliches…




    •  
      impsndcnma

      It did get a little difficult to follow, but your right the time travel was used appropriately. If only they did the same for the TK powers.




  4.  

    Pierce Gagnon is a little star in the making.

    Like Scott said above, there were no time travel cliches. The film took the notion of time travel and rather than enveloping the whole film with it, just used it to develop the story. It wasn’t about time travel as such. Which is what I really loved about the film.




    •  
      impsndcnma

      I\’m glad you enjoyed it. I was actually looking for it to have more time travel emphasis which is why I think I don\’t love it. Nevertheless its a fine movie.




  5.  

    So looking forward to clapping my eyes on this one! Nice review, Max.




  6.  

    Nice job, Max. I think that Looper offers a great (and rare) example of a movie that wasn’t spoiled by its trailer. There’s enough in the preview to make it look intriguing because of the premise, but it doesn’t spoil the second half. I really wish more films took this route, though I know they all don’t have the luxury of such a clever time-travel premise.




    •  
      impsndcnma

      It\’s funny that you mention that it wasn\’t spoiled. I also think they were hiding the other piece to the puzzle since it might\’ve been less appealing to a mass market. It is a good idea to hide the movie though. I think The Master did a terrific job hiding the movie, given P.T. Anderson shot specific material just for the trailers.




  7.  

    Good review! I loved the movie – it was so original and engaging. I don’t really understand why people have issue with telekinesis in it – it’s a movie about time travel which in my book is much less possible than telekinesis. Plus TK was present throuhout the movie in various scenes, so it wasn’t like it came out of nowhere.





Leave a Reply